‘It will halt life-saving research’: Trump freezes $2.3B in funding to Harvard — threatens school's tax-exempt status as the White House escalates its crackdown on elite universities

What’s really going on?

On April 3, the U.S. Department of Education placed Harvard University under administrative review, signaling heightened federal scrutiny over the institution’s core operations.

The review includes several preconditions the Trump administration believes are “necessary for Harvard University’s continued financial relationship with the United States government.” These demands include oversight of hiring practices, admissions, student discipline, governance and academic leadership.

In response, a number of Harvard faculty members expressed concern over the administration’s move, framing it as a challenge to institutional autonomy.

Some argue that Harvard, with its $53.2 billion endowment — the largest of any university in the world — is financially well-positioned to withstand potential federal funding cuts. Approximately 20% of the endowment is unrestricted, giving the university discretion over nearly $10 billion in funds.

In a recent statement, Garber emphasized the university’s commitment to its mission and academic freedom, stating, “We resolve to take the measures that will move Harvard and its vital mission forward while protecting our community and its academic freedom.”

Invest in real estate without the headache of being a landlord

Imagine owning a portfolio of thousands of well-managed single family rentals or a collection of cutting-edge industrial warehouses. You can now gain access to a $1B portfolio of income-producing real estate assets designed to deliver long-term growth from the comforts of your couch.

The best part? You don’t have to be a millionaire and can start investing in minutes.

Learn More

What does this mean for students?

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Vice Provost for Global Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania, emphasizes that these cuts could hinder scientific research and local economies. He notes that major advancements since 2000, such as mRNA vaccines and GLP-1 anti-obesity drugs, originated from university labs. Reduced funding may limit students' opportunities to engage in this sort of groundbreaking research.

The consequences are also being felt by international students. Deportation proceedings have begun for some international students who were detained after participating in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Additionally, visas for several hundred foreign students have been canceled, a development that may affect future enrollment figures.

In a public letter, Garber argued the Trump administration’s demands extend well beyond combating antisemitism, calling them an attempt to regulate the “intellectual conditions” of higher education.

“No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,” Garber wrote.

For students, the financial toll may prove to be the most immediate concern. With reduced federal support, students could face greater reliance on private loans to meet rising tuition costs — widening the access gap and placing higher education further out of reach for low-income students.

Uncertainty about the future of funding has led some universities to accept fewer graduate students, narrowing many pathways to advanced degrees and research opportunities. Many graduate students depend on federal research grants for scholarships and stipends, and funding cuts can directly impact their academic and professional trajectories.